Page 4 - Reflections_dyslipidaemia_newsletter4_2023
P. 4

REFLECTIONS
                                                                                                                   Dyslipidaemia
     Dyslipidaemia Global Newsletter #4 2023


     inhibition is a novel strategy that may be considered.     than 20,000 patients comparing more with less intensive LDL-C
                                                                lowering after ischaemic stroke, more intensive LDL-C lowering
     This consensus statement from the Association for Acute    was associated with an increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke,
                                                                                                                   Dyslipidaemia
     CardioVascular (ACVC), in collaboration with the European   while the rate of recurrent stroke and MACE were reduced. But
     Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) and the European   the number needed to treat to prevent a recurrent stroke within
     Society of Cardiology (ESC) working group on cardiovascular   four years was 90 and for preventing a MACE was 35, while
     pharmacotherapy review the evidence to support this new    the number needed to harm for a haemorrhagic stroke was
     approach and focus on the hurdles and solutions to provide   242. Therefore, the benefits and risks of more intensive LDL-C
     high-quality, evidence-based follow-up care in post-ACS    lowering might be more favourable overall as compared to
     patients.                                                  less intensive LDL-C, especially in patients with atherosclerotic
                                                                disease.
     Most lipid-lowering drug studies have focused on the degree of
     LDL-C lowering rather than the rapidity of lipid lowering. Time is   The proposed lipid-lowering algorithm stratifies patients
     of particular importance post-ACS when patients are at elevated   to statin-naïve, patient on statin, or patient with suspected
     risk of recurrent events. High-intensity statin treatment has been   statin intolerance. For those that are statin-naïve, the authors
     shown to reduce LDL-C by 50% and combination with ezetimibe   recommend immediately initiating high-intensity LLT, preferably
     reduces LDL-C by 65% from baseline. While the rapidity of   before coronary angiography. For those currently on a statin,
     LDL-C lowering has not been systematically assessed, the   it is important to continue high-intensity statin therapy without
     authors provide reported results at two weeks after therapy   interruption or to escalate to a high-intensity statin. In addition,
     initiation, where available. Maximal LDL-C lowering effects were   the addition of ezetimibe early after ACS is reasonable. In
     seen in the PCSK9-group which had LDL-C levels reduced by   those patients with high-risk features, such as multivessel CAD,
     50–60% after two weeks of treatment.                       polyvascular disease, or FH, the authors suggest consideration
                                                                of PCSK9i in the acute phase.
     The concern that aggressive LDL-C lowering could promote
     haemorrhagic stroke was not shown to be true in the        The authors highlight that an ideal care pathway for suspected
     prespecified ODYSSEY OUTCOMES analysis where the rate      statin intolerance has yet to be established, especially in
     of haemorrhagic stroke after ACS was almost negligible and not   high-risk situations such as in the immediate phase post-ACS.
     increased by the PCSK9 antibody alirocumab vs. placebo. In   Several studies suggest that muscle symptoms may be due to
     addition, in a recent meta-analysis including 11 trials with more   a nocebo effect, and that a large percentage of patients were






































          TABLE OF CONTENTS
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9