Page 10 - Reflections_dyslipidaemia_newsletter4_2023
P. 10

REFLECTIONS
                                                                                                                   Dyslipidaemia
     Dyslipidaemia Global Newsletter #4 2023



     measured RC using nuclear magnetic resonance indicated                                                        Dyslipidaemia
     that calculated RC was positively consistent with measured RC      CLINICAL PEARLS FROM THE FACULTY
     at high TG levels (≥150 mg/dL), but was poorly correlated with
     measured RC when the TG levels were <150 mg/dL. In addition,
     there are some controversies regarding the use of fasting or
     non-fasting remnant lipid profiles to predict potential CVD risk.
     Several current recommendations support the use of a random,
     non-fasting lipid profile in clinical practice for CVD risk prediction,
     and a subgroup analysis of the data in the publication showed
     that regardless of the use of fasting or non-fasting RC, elevated
     RC is associated with an elevated CVD risk. This will allow for
     convenience in using non-fasting RC in clinic follow-ups.
                                                                           WATCH

     The authors suggest that it is reasonable to conclude that RC-        PROF. FARNIER DISCUSS THE
     lowering therapy can further reduce residual CVD risks. Statins       RELEVANCE OF THESE RESULTS FOR
     have been shown to reduce RC, and a combination of statin             CLINICAL PRACTICE.
     with ezetimibe was shown to reduce RC to a greater extent than
     using ezetimibe or statins alone.

     It is also unclear if the use of RC as a risk marker for initially   CLICK HERE
     identifying high-risk patients can improve the 10-year risk score.   FOR THE LINK TO FULL ARTICLE
     Further studies are needed to explore and validate the 10-year
     risk score when using RC as a risk marker for CVD events.



     Lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis:
     A European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement.

     Kronenberg F, et al. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(39):3925-3946.

     Since the 2010 European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) consensus statement, there has been extensive research on the role of
     Lp(a) in ASCVD and aortic valve stenosis. The 2022 EAS lipoprotein(a) consensus statement, therefore, updates the evidence for
     the role of Lp(a) in ASCVD and aortic valve stenosis, provides clinical guidance for testing and treating elevated Lp(a) levels, and
     discusses inclusion of Lp(a) in global risk estimation.

     Lp(a) concentration is predominantly determined by genetics (>90%), more than any other lipoprotein.  The authors also noted
     that Lp(a) level varies with ethnicity (in increasing order: Chinese, White, South Asian, and Black individuals). There are also sex
     differences, with Lp(a) concentration generally ~5–10% higher in women than men, and while Lp(a) remains relatively constant
     throughout the lifespan, women levels tend to increase at menopause.

     Non-genetic factors may also influence Lp(a) concentration, including lifestyle, hormones and related conditions, chronic kidney
     disease, hepatic impairment, and inflammation and related conditions (see table below for details within each category).
















          TABLE OF CONTENTS
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14